Even if true, that would be like saying I purchased a Rolls-Royce that works like a Buick. I got a single reply from one owner and it was very vague, in that he implied that he didn’t need the functions in question. Mint!! I have been asking on the Avid site for more than a year! If I got a reply at all, it was a suggestion to come ask on the Steinberg Forum. I know you and many others like the Nuage.Trying to get an answer to THAT question is like trying to gain access to the U.S. If you don’t like the Nuage form factor that means Cubendo is a lot less attractive. There simply is so hardware solution working to the same professional standards as for ProTools below the Nuage if you want more than simple fader up/fader down for Cubendo. So while people have been screaming for bug fixes for controllers in Cubendo, AVID (who get a lot of crap in this forum) offer brilliantly working solutions, tightly integrated with their DAW for every budget and form factor. A gazillion times better than my WK or my old AMEK ever were. ![]() I have an S3 myself and the unit is AMAZING with ProTools Ultimate. People buy expensive guitars for thousands of dollars and I hear the S1’s are selling like crazy. I disagreed strongly, at that moment there were no S3 and S1, just the artist range. It seemed their product management was not interested because apparently they thought the market is too small or they have been burned by (the terribly toyish looking) Houston. That’s why I spoke to Steinberg years ago about the huge gap between the Nuage and the CC121. I understand that it’s not much fun from a business side to spend huge amounts of money developing for a moving target and see some other company taking the profits (by selling the hardware). What I read between the lines of the feature request is the need for a working solution to the problems and/or the need for a smaller form factor/budget hardware. I am not saying that Avid does that on purpose, to annoy the other manufacturers.įact remains that this is what is happening, and reason why every DAW builder always need to play catch-up with the newest developments.Īnd there isn’t always time to react quickly, or the resources aren’t there, etc … A bit like they have -and are- doing with OMF and AAF. So now we are in a situation where Avid changes whatever they want to the Eucon Protocol, and every other DAW builder needs to follow what Avid is doing/changing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |